6/17/20
There are some clubs that lift me up (which most are) and there are some clubs that drag me down. Sadly this club was one of the latter, however, it must be noted that visiting a club on a one-time basis gives a very limited view and it is possible that other meetings are wonderful.
They have 15 members and five educational awards and are distinguished so it should follow that this club should be one of the ones that lift me up. But further exploration shows they have been struggling and they may now be getting their footing. They have two coaches, Toastmaster Jones and Toastmaster Tucker. They had 12 new members join this Toastmasters year and currently have 15 members so there is a lot of turnover. We arrived 15 minutes early. There were a couple of people there, but no one greeted us. Coach Tucker was busily trying to fill roles. She kept asking if anyone would fill roles and no one responded. Finally I piped up and said that Steve and I would be willing to step in and do a role if they needed help. She said we could be general evaluator (I really hate it when we are treated as one person instead of two, but I have addressed that on a different blog).
The Toastmaster of the Day seemed woefully unprepared. He asked if anyone had the Word of the Day which no one did so he moved on to the speakers. No intros were provided. Toastmaster Tucker introduced the first speaker and the other two speakers were left to introduce themselves before they spoke. Early before the meeting started the coach did ask one of the speakers to put her intro into chat and I assume she did, but it was not there when the Toastmaster of the Day arrived. I believe that is a feature of chat, that if you arrive after something has been put in chat then you will not be able to see it. It has to be copied and pasted in again.
They are very formal in the way they address the members. For example, we would be Toastmaster Lanham. Which would be okay, but when they put their name on the screen like that the last name can’t be shown, especially when they put Toastmaster/Table Topics Master Smith. So Steve and others were at a disadvantage trying to introduce someone when the person’s name didn’t show on the screen. My suggestion is forget putting the word ‘Toastmaster’ before their name on the screen if they are members of Toastmasters or just type TM. Because you know EVERYONE IS A TOASTMASTER. It’s one thing to orally introduce someone as Toastmaster Lanham, but it’s another thing to put it on the screen in front of your name. When the lectern was given back to the Table Topics Master, it became really wordy with “back to you Toastmaster and Table Topics Master Smith. When this culture was highlighted by the general evaluator, not as right or wrong but just different since no one in our division does it or any of the 30+ clubs in all the states we have visited do this, one member was quick to defend it and said she went to the international convention and they do it there so that’s why they do it. All power to them but the intros do get a bit wordy and writing it on the screen could be confusing so that might be something they want to think about
They ended up with 15 attendees (5 visitors) at the meeting and I was disappointed that they doubled up on roles. Coach Tucker served as Table Topics Master and an evaluator. Coach Jones served as a speaker and an evaluator. It reminded me of a club Steve and I used to be a member of, where one guy would just put himself in for all the roles if no one signed up for a role. An unintended consequence, many members felt like they were not wanted in a role and continued to allow him to do it all. They all eventually dropped out of the club. I certainly hope this meeting was an aberration and not the norm. Members need to be encouraged and asked to do roles even if it is outside their comfort zone. You can’t grow a strong club if only a few carry the load.
There were a lot of technical difficulties during this meeting. People couldn’t hear each other, there was static throughout. However, this technology is new to most Toastmasters and I was happy to see them brave through it.
At the end, the president did ask the guests to share a few words, which I always appreciate. One guest was from New York and he said he had visited all 50 states and many countries and he was making second visits to clubs he had already visited. This was his second visit to this club. He remarked the meeting looked like the last time he visited “it looked put together at the last minute”. Maybe it was a nice way of saying preparation was lacking.
The president remarked at the end that it was a great meeting because “WE HAD SPEAKERS!!”. She said this a couple of times, which makes me think that they usually don’t have speakers? That certainly made me wonder. On paper they seem like a thriving club being distinguished and having 15 members in attendance today (which is more than most of the clubs we visited and more than some of my home club meetings).
At the end of the meeting right before they adjourned, one person announced that they usually meet 10 minutes after the meeting for an educational moment to talk about how to make their meetings better. This is something the club coaches may have implemented, which is a great idea. So how does a club that looks so good on paper make me feel so "draggy"? (is that even a word?)One idea is something that happened in my division with an over-enthusiastic coach. She really wanted the credit for club coach and the club was in such bad shape that she took some creative liberties. She had people join from other clubs that were never intending to ever come to the club. She ended up giving all her awards to the club, which were quite a few. In these creative ways, she lifted the club to distinguished status and never really helped the club or members. She never encouraged them to “buy in” and take ownership of the whole club. I hope this isn’t what is happening here, but if it is, I don’t believe it’s in the club's best interest. On paper this club looks great but once those coaches leave, they may end up dropping back down or even worse. Paper numbers are good in the short term for recognition and credit's sake but for the club and its members-not so much.
I wish this club well, if it is building and on a road to success I am right behind them applauding them all day long. If this was a quick fix by the coaches, then I hope the members learn to stand on their own two feet and grow in spite of the coaches. The coaches may not always be around. Members need to volunteer for roles, members need to step up and give speeches. They need to create goals for themselves and work towards them and this means actively working in the educational program and the only way to get members to jump onboard is to show the clubs value to them. Additionally, make the club inviting and fun. Make visitors feel welcome from the very start, which did not happen for me. Good luck Downtown Jackson!! I wish you all the best.